Hadamard’s Well-Posedness Criteria

In 1902, the mathematician Jacques Hadamard formulated that a boundary value problem (often for partial differential equations, PDEs) is well-posed if it satisfies three properties:

  1. Existence of a solution.
  2. Uniqueness of that solution.
  3. Continuous dependence of the solution on the input data (i.e., small changes in boundary conditions, initial conditions, or parameters lead to small changes in the solution).

These criteria ensure that the problem is both physically and mathematically meaningful:

Well-Posedness in the Context of FEM

Connection to the Underlying PDE

The Finite Element Method is a numerical technique to approximate solutions of PDEs (or integral equations). Whether or not an FEM solution behaves well is intrinsically tied to the well-posedness of the underlying continuous problem.

  1. If the PDE is well-posed:
  2. If the PDE is ill-posed:

FEM Formulation and Convergence

In simpler, linear PDE problems (e.g., linear elasticity, heat conduction without phase change), well-posedness is often guaranteed by classical theorems such as the Lax–Milgram theorem. This theorem states that if a PDE problem is:

then the FEM solution exists, is unique, and converges to the real solution as the mesh is refined. This is a direct application of Hadamard’s idea in a functional analysis framework.